If recycling plastics isn’t making sense, remake the plastics

Patrick
Enlarge / Workers sort plastic waste as a forklift transports plastic waste at Yongin Recycling Center in Yongin, South Korea.

A few years back, it looked like plastic recycling was set to become a key part of a sustainable future. Then, the price of fossil fuels plunged, making it cheaper to manufacture new plastics. Then China essentially stopped importing recycled plastics for use in manufacturing. With that, the bottom dropped out of plastic recycling, and the best thing you could say for most plastics is that they sequestered the carbon they were made of.

The absence of a market for recycled plastics, however, has also inspired researchers to look at other ways of using them. Two papers this week have looked into processes that enable “upcycling,” or converting the plastics into materials that can be more valuable than the freshly made plastics themselves.

Make me some nanotubes

The first paper, done by an international collaboration, actually obtained the plastics it tested from a supermarket chain, so we know it works on relevant materials. The upcycling it describes also has the advantage of working with very cheap, iron-based catalysts. Normally, to break down plastics, catalysts and the plastics are heated together. But in this case, the researchers simply mixed the catalyst and ground up plastics and heated the iron using microwaves.

Like water, iron absorbs microwave radiation and converts it into heat. This causes the heat to be focused on the site where catalytic activities take place, rather than being evenly spread throughout the reaction.

The difference is striking. Compared to traditional heating, the microwave heating released over 10 times as much hydrogen from the plastic, leaving very little other than pure carbon and some iron carbide behind. Better yet, the carbon was almost entirely in the form of carbon nanotubes, a product with significant value. And it all happened extremely quickly, with hydrogen being released less than a minute after the microwaves were applied. The process was completed in less than two minutes.

Although some of the iron ended up being linked to carbon, this didn’t inactivate the catalyst. The researchers found that they could mix in more ground-up plastic and start the process over again, repeating it up to 10 times in their tests, although hydrogen production was clearly dropping by cycle 10. On the plus side, the later cycles produced almost pure hydrogen, as contaminants like oxygen and water had been removed by the earlier cycles. And, at the end of 10 cycles, the carbon-rich material was 92 percent nanotubes by weight.

The only thing that’s missing from the work is an indication of how easy it would be to reform the iron into iron oxide, the catalytic form of the material.

We’ll take that hydrogen

If you were at all worried about what to do with that hydrogen, a US-based group has a potential answer. The group was also concerned about the problems the other researchers saw when they simply heated a catalyst and plastic together: the results were a complicated mix of chemicals, rather than the two clean products seen when rapid heating was done using microwaves. But this team looked to biology for possible solutions.

Source link

Next Post

Heading in the right direction

Sony’s 2020 flagship — the ultra-premium Xperia 1 II — has many strengths, but is ultimately a hard sell with its colossal $1,199/£1,099 price tag. The Xperia 5 range forms Sony’s more sensibly priced flagship tier, with the new Xperia 5 II coming in at a much more reasonable $949/£799. […]

Subscribe US Now